When hiring new staff, a thorough recruitment process can prevent you from hiring someone who ends up dividing the workplace and putting you in the red. Asking the right questions during the interviewing process, as well as being able to critically analyse a candidate’s responses, is crucial.   A recent case before the Fair Work Commission highlights the cost that a troublesome employee can have upon a small business. Last December, a regional, NSW family-owned business organised Christmas drinks to thank their staff for their hard work during the year. When the owner asked an employee, who had allegedly demonstrated…

When hiring new staff, a thorough recruitment process can prevent you from hiring someone who ends up dividing the workplace and putting you in the red. Asking the right questions during the interviewing process, as well as being able to critically analyse a candidate’s responses, is crucial.

 

A recent case before the Fair Work Commission highlights the cost that a troublesome employee can have upon a small business. Last December, a regional, NSW family-owned business organised Christmas drinks to thank their staff for their hard work during the year. When the owner asked an employee, who had allegedly demonstrated problematic workplace behaviour in the past, his food and drink preferences, the employee responded ‘I’m not f..king going because I’m not f..king drinking with f..king Captain Klepto!’

The employer dismissed the employee shortly thereafter. In response, the employee lodged an unfair dismissal bid with the Fair Work Commission, claiming that he simply and politely declined the invitation.

The Commissioner found in favour of the employer, stating that the employee’s supposed response had such a level of cordiality that it seemed to be “so unrealistic as to be fanciful.” It was determined that the employee’s dismissal was justified under the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code, with his outburst exhibiting serious and wilful misconduct.

In a case such as this one, where a full hearing is required, it can be costly for small businesses, both in court expenses and time. Employees are more aware of their workplace rights today and terminating an employee, who is ultimately insubordinate or troublesome, may seem daunting for some businesses. In concert with an unease of retaliative legal action, such elements as taking a problematic employee’s personal circumstances into account or fear of losing corporate knowledge may also lead an employer to remain inactive in regards to an unmanageable worker.

 

iHR Australia believes careful staff selection can create a productive and sound workplace. Attendees participating in iHR’s Recruitment for Non-HR Managers course learn the skills necessary for interview preparation, determining the right questions to ask and analysing a candidate’s answers. Participants are also given the opportunity to practise their newly-acquired knowledge by acting out real-life scenarios with professional actors in iHR’s Workplace Reality Theatre.

 

Recent articles

Second-hand trauma

Second-hand trauma in the line of duty: Supporting workplace investigators

Workplace investigators handle sensitive cases, often encountering traumatic materials and occasionally aggressive individuals, making them vulnerable to second-hand trauma. A...
Workplace lgislation

Navigate new and existing workplace legislation: ER expert discusses the Right to Disconnect and more

As a new wave of workplace legislation updates start to come into effect, Australian businesses must stay vigilant. Employers and...
Contact officer

Contact Officers: How to identify and appoint ‘trustworthy’ people

Article updated on 15 July 2024 [Originally published in 2017] Contact Officers play an important role in assisting employers meet...
Middle managers

Overcoming the Middle Manager Sandwich: CEO Strategies for Success

For this month's expert article, we asked John Brennan, our newly appointed CEO, to provide nuanced feedback and guidance to...