Repeated lateness was not an adequate reason for instant dismissal, the Fair Work Commission has ruled in a recent case about a tardy employee. A bridal shop worker was dismissed for repeated lateness to work, after arriving late five times over two months. The employer claimed the staff member had received warnings on each of these occasions. One week after the final incident, the employer dismissed the worker for “excessive lateness and inappropriate behaviour”. The commission found that the “warnings” issued by the employer did not adequately articulate the “consequences of repetition” that the worker would face if she continued…

Repeated lateness was not an adequate reason for instant dismissal, the Fair Work Commission has ruled in a recent case about a tardy employee.

A bridal shop worker was dismissed for repeated lateness to work, after arriving late five times over two months. The employer claimed the staff member had received warnings on each of these occasions.

One week after the final incident, the employer dismissed the worker for “excessive lateness and inappropriate behaviour”.

The commission found that the “warnings” issued by the employer did not adequately articulate the “consequences of repetition” that the worker would face if she continued to be late. It was suggested that the “warnings” were more like “comments”.

The notice of dismissal was given a week after the last incident. The commission found that the continued lateness did not justify immediate dismissal. The worker was awarded compensation.

For employers, the two key lessons here are that dealing with such a situation requires (1) a pattern of behaviour, such as repeated lateness; and (2) clearly articulated warnings related to each instance, explaining the consequences for the employee if they continue the behaviour.

One of the issues identified in this case is the necessary escalation of warnings; without that sequence of warnings, it was found here that the lateness did not warrant dismissal, even though it had been a repeated behaviour. Any warnings issued must make clear to the employee that continuing with the behaviour may have consequences, and what these consequences might be. It is also important to make sure each of these warnings is carefully documented.

iHR Australia offers training including Managing Everyday Performance to help managers and supervisors learn skills for effective performance management.

Recent articles

Second-hand trauma

Second-hand trauma in the line of duty: Supporting workplace investigators

Workplace investigators handle sensitive cases, often encountering traumatic materials and occasionally aggressive individuals, making them vulnerable to second-hand trauma. A...
Workplace lgislation

Navigate new and existing workplace legislation: ER expert discusses the Right to Disconnect and more

As a new wave of workplace legislation updates start to come into effect, Australian businesses must stay vigilant. Employers and...
Contact officer

Contact Officers: How to identify and appoint ‘trustworthy’ people

Article updated on 15 July 2024 [Originally published in 2017] Contact Officers play an important role in assisting employers meet...
Middle managers

Overcoming the Middle Manager Sandwich: CEO Strategies for Success

For this month's expert article, we asked John Brennan, our newly appointed CEO, to provide nuanced feedback and guidance to...