The debate continues on recruiters using social media to vet new recruits. Although it seems to be reasonably common for recruiters to check social media, is it actually useful? And what about any ethical or legal implications?

 

Earlier this year, a study by the universities of Northern Illinois, Evansville and Auburn, looked into the possible link between a person’s online persona and their behaviour at work.

The study involved a group of subjects completing a “personality test” questionnaire used by companies to measure key personality traits. Three “raters” were given access to the subjects’ Facebook profiles which they used to complete a similar questionnaire about the subject. The researchers then calculated scores based on these tests and compared them. They found that the raters’ and subjects’ scores were similar, indicating that the Facebook profiles gave a reasonably accurate portrayal of the subjects.

Six months later, researchers chose a group of the subjects and asked their supervisors at work to fill in performance evaluations. They discovered that the scores from the supervisors were a close match to what the raters said. This would indicate that a Facebook profile could be fairly accurate in predicting how a person will perform at work, potentially making it a handy resource for recruiters.

That said, in the US there are signs of increasing opposition to employers using invasive tactics when conducting online checks. Following concerns about privacy, the New Jersey state senate passed a bill in October of this year, which bans employers from asking employees or potential employees to hand over log in details for social networking sites. Under the bill, a worker is also allowed to sue an employer for lost earnings if they lose their job or promotion or if they are not hired because of online snooping.

 

This shows that the concerns about privacy are real and some organisations have even taken the step of banning staff from using social networking sites as a recruitment tool. A survey by CareerBuilder found that, of those who claimed not to use social media checks, 15% said their organisations had banned the practice.

So is social media screening suspicious snooping or just a smart selection tactic? Remember that in all recruitment practices, fairness and obeying the principles of EEO are paramount and recruiters must take care that their choices do not leave them open to claims of unethical behaviour.

Recent articles

Trauma informed investigations

Trauma-informed workplace investigations: Prioritising ‘care’ over rigid processes

Interviewee: Kirsten Hartmann, Senior Workplace Relations Adviser/Workplace Investigator In August 2023, the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) released four guiding...
Reverse bullying

Reverse Bullying is a Threat to Your Workplace Culture: Here is What it Looks Like

Article updated on 15 March 2024 [Originally published in 2020] What is reverse [or upward] bullying? Simply put, reverse bullying...

The First Tranche of the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023

Closing Loopholes Legislation Key changes taking effect from 15 December 2023 In late 2023, the Federal Government passed the first...
Low job control

Eliminate Low Job Control and Empower Your Employees: A Breakdown of the First Webinar

Safe Work Australia has pinpointed 14 psychosocial risks that can adversely affect not only productivity and engagement levels, but also...